In
honor of National Fire Prevention Week, recognized Oct 9 through 15, 2016, I’m
reprinting, with permission, an essay written by a young friend of mine who
wishes to remain anonymous. Our society has benefited greatly from the
invention of an automatic sprinkler system.
Such a simple concept, when you read about it. I found this a very interesting essay and I
wanted to share it with you, and perhaps give you something to think about and be thankful for this week. (ps...any typos are mine as I had to transcribe from hard copy...)
Mrs.
O’Leary and her fabled “cow-tastrophe” which resulted in the Great Chicago Fire
of 1871 would not have become legendary if automatic fire sprinklers had been
installed in her barn. But the first practical
system would not be invented for another three years.
Two-hundred
people who perished when a gas lamp ignited a fire at the Paris Opera in 1897
would not have had their lives cut short had automatic fire sprinklers been
installed. But the first system was
designed to protect commercial goods stored in warehouses, not to save lives.
Four-hundred
and sixty-four Paraguayans would still be alive today had there been sprinklers
at the Ycuá Bolaños Botánico Supermarket when a fire swept through there in
2004. But Asunción city code does not
require automatic sprinkler systems be installed in new construction.
When Henry Parmalee’s fire insurance premiums for his piano factory in Connecticut
rose after the costly fires in Chicago and Boston in the early 1870s, he was
inspired to find a way to prevent fire damage, hoping to eliminate the expense
of insurance. He is credited with
inventing the first modern automatic fire sprinkler system by combining and
improving Carey and Cosgrove’s ideas.
Parmalee develop a technique of soldering a brass cap over holes in the
system of overhead water pipes. The
solder holding the cap would melt at 160 degrees, releasing water and quenching
the fire within minutes.
Once
perfected, Henry’s brother George took the idea back to England, marketing the
system via a 19th-Century equivalent of an infomercial. In 1874, George constructed a 20x30 shed and
filled the floor with wood shavings and paraffin oil before setting fire to
it. With spectators running away for
fear of a conflagration that would certainly destroy their village, the
overhead sprinkler system engaged at one minute, twenty seconds. The fire was completely extinguished with no
damage to any of the surrounding buildings.
George traveled from town to town, performing these dramatic
demonstrations, proving the benefits of automated fire prevention systems.
Back
in the United States, Frederick Grinnell, as head of the Providence (RI) Steam
and Gas Company, perfected the process with a more even water distribution
system. His company was primarily responsible
for the installation of over 20,000 sprinkler systems in the textile mills of
New England. As expected, property
losses due to fire decreased significantly, yet high-risk cotton mills were
still unable to obtain fire insurance.
The formation of a cotton-owners mutual insurance company prompted a
commitment to the continued development and implementation of fire prevention
systems, giving birth to a new industry.
The
demand for automated sprinkler systems resulted in a flurry of improvements
over the next hundred years. Today’s systems are based on Colonel Cosgrove’s
idea of a network of pipes with heads at specified intervals installed in
ceilings as well as walls. The plug
release has evolved to glass bulbs that burst when the water inside expands
when heated by a fire. Additional improvements
have been made with the addition of a Pelton Wheel that spins to distribute the
water, and shut-off valves so the system can be turned off once the fire is
extinguished.
While
automatic fire sprinklers were developed to limit loss of property in the highly
flammable textile factories, their greatest impact would come in saving human
life. Following the catastrophic fires
in 1942 at the Coconut Grove Nightclub in Boston, where 492 people lost their
lives, and the 1946 catastrophe at the Winecoff Hotel in Atlanta which resulted
in 19 deaths, officials looked to the success rates of sprinklers in the
industrial sector and evaluated their applicability and adaptability to public
buildings. As a result, building codes throughout the United States currently
require automated fire sprinkler systems in schools, hospitals, hotels,
retirement homes and other buildings where rapid evacuation of occupants is complicated.
State and city codes often go further and require them in apartment buildings
or, in some cases, private residences.
The
impact of the development of automatic fire sprinklers can be measured in lives
and/or property saved. Consider the
facts:
- · There has never been a multiple loss of life from fire of occupants in a building with a properly designed, installed and maintained fire sprinkler system;
- · Average loss for a fire incident in a building protected by fire sprinkler systems was 90% less than ones without;
- · Ninety-two percent of fires were contained by one or two activated sprinkler heads.
No comments:
Post a Comment